Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Making Money Program




If, in the future, Republicans ever again ask "Where are the jobs?" it will be because they've forgotten where they buried the ones they killed. For now, though, it's clear they remember all too well.

Like a serial killer returning to a favorite dump site to reminisce or further ravage a corpse, Republicans are returning to the scene of the crime for a bit of fun with the still-fresh remains of 240,000 jobs the GOP killed off last month.


They're coming back for more. On Monday, the Republican Study Committee released this statement:




With the national debt quickly approaching $14 trillion, Washington needs to get serious about cutting spending. One option the next Congress should consider is to restore welfare reform, one of the most successful bipartisan initiatives of the 1990s.



The 1996 welfare reform law created incentives for states to help people get back on their feet and off of taxpayer assistance. However, the 2009 stimulus package created a new "emergency fund" under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program which actually incentivizes states to increase their welfare caseloads without requiring able-bodied individuals to work, get job training, or make other efforts to move off of taxpayer assistance. Specifically, a state must increase its welfare caseloads in order to receive any funding, and states receive an 80% match to cover all expenses associated with increasing their welfare caseloads. This costs taxpayers $2.5 billion each year.




Just a couple of points here.



First, thanks to the GOP's obstruction, the TANF Emergency Fund expired on September 30, 2010, effectively putting the 240,000 people who found work through the program out of work. (This must be one of those "We had to destroy the village in order to save it," moments — when conservatives have to kill jobs in order to create them.) It was funded at $5 billion over two years. Now it's dead. The GOP killed it. There have been efforts to extend it, but at a maximum of $2.5 billion.



Second, where does this business about not "requiring able-bodied individuals to work" come from? The Emergency fund has, in its brief existence, put people to work who want to work and would have been out of work otherwise. The money from the Emergency Fund was used by states to subsidize jobs programs that have successfully put "able bodied individuals to work" — including some 120,000 young people who would not have had summer jobs, and 130,000 parents who wouldn't have had jobs to provide for their families.



Some of the successes of the Emergency Fund include:



  • South Carolina is using the program to provide jobs to parents who would otherwise be receiving cash assistance through the state's regular TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) program.


  • Illinois has placed more than 20,000 individuals in jobs, far exceeding its original goal of 12,000 placements.


  • Alabama is using the program to provide jobs to TANF recipients statewide, but has found it especially helpful in rural communities where very few job opportunities exist.


  • North Dakota is providing jobs for unemployed non-custodial parents who don't have the financial resources to meet their child support.


  • A rural community in Tennessee created 400 new jobs and helped reduce the county's unemployment rate from 27.3 to 18.6 percent over an eight-month period.



There's a whole lot more here, on how states used TANF to subsidize job programs and put people to work — people who would otherwise have just received cash assistance.



This, Republicans apparently believe, is a very bad thing. Maybe the GOP doesn't think these are "real" jobs. Maybe, like the aforementioned serial killer, the GOP just thinks some jobs need to die, because some jobs shouldn't exist in the first place. Likewise the people whose lives have gotten better because of those jobs.


The point is that the TANF Emergency Fund is an example of a safety net that works when the economy doesn't — like unemployment benefits keeping millions out of poverty — by putting hundreds of thousands of people back to work, where they can learn use their skills instead of lose them, and perhaps learn new skills that may lead to better jobs and better lives. If you want to talk about incentives, these are people who would otherwise have been collecting TANF cash benefits that aren't enough to meet basic needs.


Besides, if Republicans really want something to cut, there are far meatier parts of the budget just waiting for someone with a sharp knife.




One place Democrats could start fighting -- if they can find the backbone -- is to call out the new Republican Speaker Of The House John Boehner over his desire to trim the deficit with Draconian cuts in the federal budget. The word he used was "discretionary" funding. The largest discretionary line in the budget is the Pentagon.



This is a major pissing contest just waiting for somebody to begin the challenge. And the perfect place to start is for somebody to piss on Boehner's shoes

.

The Pentagon budget is the largest elephant in the room that no one except the antiwar left will talk about. There is no good reason for this, since the crisis represented by the bloated Pentagon budget goes far beyond the anti-war movement, reaching into the lives of all working Americans. Sure, it will mean a fight, but fighting is good at this juncture - much better than laying down.




No, it's far far better for them to be unemployed and wait for the private sector to create jobs, when taxes and wages are finally low enough. The GOP has no immediate plans to create jobs to replace those they're so eager to kill off. Their best idea is a old, one one: cut taxes and hope for the best. We know what that got us last time: a decade of zero job growth.


That the 240,000 people who will be out of work again are unlikely to find work in the private sector hardly matters. When the people who had work through the TANF Emergency Fund are finally out of work, the GOP will probably deny them unemployment benefits, too, just for kicks.


Until then, there's still some fun to be had with the still-fresh corpse of the TANF Emergency Fund.


-->




  • Why should my taxes subsidize your home purchase
    by izoneguy




  • Thune and Hatch
    by hoosierdoug




  • I won't forget Sean Bielat!
    by Philip




  • No matter what
    by caboose




  • That would be un-democratic
    by whats_up




  • Jeb? Really? We can do better.
    by acat




  • "Enemy of the State"?
    by myron_j_poltroonian




  • Wow, so lobbyists and special interests
    by Death_of_the_Donkey




  • the squeaky wheel gets the oil
    by chamberD




  • You still haven't given me
    by Death_of_the_Donkey




  • No, cheated is accurate. Obama's from Chicago.
    by acat




  • Speak for yourself
    by izoneguy




  • my heroes
    by elizabeth bennet




  • Eliminating the mortgage deduction would do more harm than good
    by izoneguy




  • Ann Marie is the voice of NY CD 25
    by plepaul




  • "Sans Culottes"?
    by myron_j_poltroonian




  • Only if we stay awake this time, Elizabeth.
    by acat




  • We Want to Win
    by Donald Ayotte




  • A link to the TX 27 Texas Sons of Liberty Riders - a comments page about the recount.
    by Philip




  • First
    by Death_of_the_Donkey




  • they still don't get it
    by elizabeth bennet




  • Not trying to
    by powertothepeople




  • Thank you for helping to keep these important races in the public eye.
    by Philip




  • WELLL...I did notice you did not mention the Hillary factor but
    by graciegirl




  • reaganauh2o- I think I have the answer to that
    by Scope




  • Awesome diary.
    by Tanggor




  • Would the mortgage interest deduction really melt down markets?
    by civil_truth




  • chamberD- It's not my attitude that needs adjusting
    by Scope




  • Sorry, than I must have misread something.
    by earlgrey




  • If They Didn't Propose 'Means-Test' Entitlements, They Weren't Serious (nt)
    by IJB




  • 5+5
    by fpete13527




  • No reason not to have more judicial elections
    by Christopher Renner




  • bigredone- This is exactly why
    by Scope




  • There's Another Campaign Law That Needs To Be Changed!
    by IJB




  • The elimination of dubious incentives like the mortgage interest deduction goes a long way to winning my favor on this report
    by izoneguy




  • I hope so too...
    by NeoKong




  • Don't let up...... Ever.
    by Kenny Solomon




  • No eminent domain for private gain
    by wattchildress




  • McCain-Feingold, SEC 601
    by BigGator5




  • Yes!
    by warkarma





eric seiger

New Michael Jackson Track, &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39;, In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>

Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...

Olbermann Suspension Helped Fox <b>News</b> | FrumForum

MSNBC isn't an impartial arbiter of news, at least not the sanctified area in which Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and Rachel Maddow inhabit. It never was. And you may not see flowing robes and white collars but they preach to the choir all the ...

Michael Jackson&#39;s &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39; Saga Continues With Tweets <b>...</b>

"Regarding the song 'Breaking News' I am so sorry you have to deal with this. My uncle loved you so much and would not want it this way," Jackson's nephew Taryll tweeted. There are songs that are my uncle singing on the upcoming album ...


eric seiger



If, in the future, Republicans ever again ask "Where are the jobs?" it will be because they've forgotten where they buried the ones they killed. For now, though, it's clear they remember all too well.

Like a serial killer returning to a favorite dump site to reminisce or further ravage a corpse, Republicans are returning to the scene of the crime for a bit of fun with the still-fresh remains of 240,000 jobs the GOP killed off last month.


They're coming back for more. On Monday, the Republican Study Committee released this statement:




With the national debt quickly approaching $14 trillion, Washington needs to get serious about cutting spending. One option the next Congress should consider is to restore welfare reform, one of the most successful bipartisan initiatives of the 1990s.



The 1996 welfare reform law created incentives for states to help people get back on their feet and off of taxpayer assistance. However, the 2009 stimulus package created a new "emergency fund" under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program which actually incentivizes states to increase their welfare caseloads without requiring able-bodied individuals to work, get job training, or make other efforts to move off of taxpayer assistance. Specifically, a state must increase its welfare caseloads in order to receive any funding, and states receive an 80% match to cover all expenses associated with increasing their welfare caseloads. This costs taxpayers $2.5 billion each year.




Just a couple of points here.



First, thanks to the GOP's obstruction, the TANF Emergency Fund expired on September 30, 2010, effectively putting the 240,000 people who found work through the program out of work. (This must be one of those "We had to destroy the village in order to save it," moments — when conservatives have to kill jobs in order to create them.) It was funded at $5 billion over two years. Now it's dead. The GOP killed it. There have been efforts to extend it, but at a maximum of $2.5 billion.



Second, where does this business about not "requiring able-bodied individuals to work" come from? The Emergency fund has, in its brief existence, put people to work who want to work and would have been out of work otherwise. The money from the Emergency Fund was used by states to subsidize jobs programs that have successfully put "able bodied individuals to work" — including some 120,000 young people who would not have had summer jobs, and 130,000 parents who wouldn't have had jobs to provide for their families.



Some of the successes of the Emergency Fund include:



  • South Carolina is using the program to provide jobs to parents who would otherwise be receiving cash assistance through the state's regular TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) program.


  • Illinois has placed more than 20,000 individuals in jobs, far exceeding its original goal of 12,000 placements.


  • Alabama is using the program to provide jobs to TANF recipients statewide, but has found it especially helpful in rural communities where very few job opportunities exist.


  • North Dakota is providing jobs for unemployed non-custodial parents who don't have the financial resources to meet their child support.


  • A rural community in Tennessee created 400 new jobs and helped reduce the county's unemployment rate from 27.3 to 18.6 percent over an eight-month period.



There's a whole lot more here, on how states used TANF to subsidize job programs and put people to work — people who would otherwise have just received cash assistance.



This, Republicans apparently believe, is a very bad thing. Maybe the GOP doesn't think these are "real" jobs. Maybe, like the aforementioned serial killer, the GOP just thinks some jobs need to die, because some jobs shouldn't exist in the first place. Likewise the people whose lives have gotten better because of those jobs.


The point is that the TANF Emergency Fund is an example of a safety net that works when the economy doesn't — like unemployment benefits keeping millions out of poverty — by putting hundreds of thousands of people back to work, where they can learn use their skills instead of lose them, and perhaps learn new skills that may lead to better jobs and better lives. If you want to talk about incentives, these are people who would otherwise have been collecting TANF cash benefits that aren't enough to meet basic needs.


Besides, if Republicans really want something to cut, there are far meatier parts of the budget just waiting for someone with a sharp knife.




One place Democrats could start fighting -- if they can find the backbone -- is to call out the new Republican Speaker Of The House John Boehner over his desire to trim the deficit with Draconian cuts in the federal budget. The word he used was "discretionary" funding. The largest discretionary line in the budget is the Pentagon.



This is a major pissing contest just waiting for somebody to begin the challenge. And the perfect place to start is for somebody to piss on Boehner's shoes

.

The Pentagon budget is the largest elephant in the room that no one except the antiwar left will talk about. There is no good reason for this, since the crisis represented by the bloated Pentagon budget goes far beyond the anti-war movement, reaching into the lives of all working Americans. Sure, it will mean a fight, but fighting is good at this juncture - much better than laying down.




No, it's far far better for them to be unemployed and wait for the private sector to create jobs, when taxes and wages are finally low enough. The GOP has no immediate plans to create jobs to replace those they're so eager to kill off. Their best idea is a old, one one: cut taxes and hope for the best. We know what that got us last time: a decade of zero job growth.


That the 240,000 people who will be out of work again are unlikely to find work in the private sector hardly matters. When the people who had work through the TANF Emergency Fund are finally out of work, the GOP will probably deny them unemployment benefits, too, just for kicks.


Until then, there's still some fun to be had with the still-fresh corpse of the TANF Emergency Fund.


-->




  • Why should my taxes subsidize your home purchase
    by izoneguy




  • Thune and Hatch
    by hoosierdoug




  • I won't forget Sean Bielat!
    by Philip




  • No matter what
    by caboose




  • That would be un-democratic
    by whats_up




  • Jeb? Really? We can do better.
    by acat




  • "Enemy of the State"?
    by myron_j_poltroonian




  • Wow, so lobbyists and special interests
    by Death_of_the_Donkey




  • the squeaky wheel gets the oil
    by chamberD




  • You still haven't given me
    by Death_of_the_Donkey




  • No, cheated is accurate. Obama's from Chicago.
    by acat




  • Speak for yourself
    by izoneguy




  • my heroes
    by elizabeth bennet




  • Eliminating the mortgage deduction would do more harm than good
    by izoneguy




  • Ann Marie is the voice of NY CD 25
    by plepaul




  • "Sans Culottes"?
    by myron_j_poltroonian




  • Only if we stay awake this time, Elizabeth.
    by acat




  • We Want to Win
    by Donald Ayotte




  • A link to the TX 27 Texas Sons of Liberty Riders - a comments page about the recount.
    by Philip




  • First
    by Death_of_the_Donkey




  • they still don't get it
    by elizabeth bennet




  • Not trying to
    by powertothepeople




  • Thank you for helping to keep these important races in the public eye.
    by Philip




  • WELLL...I did notice you did not mention the Hillary factor but
    by graciegirl




  • reaganauh2o- I think I have the answer to that
    by Scope




  • Awesome diary.
    by Tanggor




  • Would the mortgage interest deduction really melt down markets?
    by civil_truth




  • chamberD- It's not my attitude that needs adjusting
    by Scope




  • Sorry, than I must have misread something.
    by earlgrey




  • If They Didn't Propose 'Means-Test' Entitlements, They Weren't Serious (nt)
    by IJB




  • 5+5
    by fpete13527




  • No reason not to have more judicial elections
    by Christopher Renner




  • bigredone- This is exactly why
    by Scope




  • There's Another Campaign Law That Needs To Be Changed!
    by IJB




  • The elimination of dubious incentives like the mortgage interest deduction goes a long way to winning my favor on this report
    by izoneguy




  • I hope so too...
    by NeoKong




  • Don't let up...... Ever.
    by Kenny Solomon




  • No eminent domain for private gain
    by wattchildress




  • McCain-Feingold, SEC 601
    by BigGator5




  • Yes!
    by warkarma





eric seiger

New Michael Jackson Track, &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39;, In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>

Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...

Olbermann Suspension Helped Fox <b>News</b> | FrumForum

MSNBC isn't an impartial arbiter of news, at least not the sanctified area in which Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and Rachel Maddow inhabit. It never was. And you may not see flowing robes and white collars but they preach to the choir all the ...

Michael Jackson&#39;s &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39; Saga Continues With Tweets <b>...</b>

"Regarding the song 'Breaking News' I am so sorry you have to deal with this. My uncle loved you so much and would not want it this way," Jackson's nephew Taryll tweeted. There are songs that are my uncle singing on the upcoming album ...


eric seiger

eric seiger

Shawn Collins &amp; Missy Ward talk Affiliate Marketing at IMS 2009 by LevelTen_Colin


eric seiger

New Michael Jackson Track, &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39;, In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>

Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...

Olbermann Suspension Helped Fox <b>News</b> | FrumForum

MSNBC isn't an impartial arbiter of news, at least not the sanctified area in which Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and Rachel Maddow inhabit. It never was. And you may not see flowing robes and white collars but they preach to the choir all the ...

Michael Jackson&#39;s &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39; Saga Continues With Tweets <b>...</b>

"Regarding the song 'Breaking News' I am so sorry you have to deal with this. My uncle loved you so much and would not want it this way," Jackson's nephew Taryll tweeted. There are songs that are my uncle singing on the upcoming album ...


eric seiger



If, in the future, Republicans ever again ask "Where are the jobs?" it will be because they've forgotten where they buried the ones they killed. For now, though, it's clear they remember all too well.

Like a serial killer returning to a favorite dump site to reminisce or further ravage a corpse, Republicans are returning to the scene of the crime for a bit of fun with the still-fresh remains of 240,000 jobs the GOP killed off last month.


They're coming back for more. On Monday, the Republican Study Committee released this statement:




With the national debt quickly approaching $14 trillion, Washington needs to get serious about cutting spending. One option the next Congress should consider is to restore welfare reform, one of the most successful bipartisan initiatives of the 1990s.



The 1996 welfare reform law created incentives for states to help people get back on their feet and off of taxpayer assistance. However, the 2009 stimulus package created a new "emergency fund" under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program which actually incentivizes states to increase their welfare caseloads without requiring able-bodied individuals to work, get job training, or make other efforts to move off of taxpayer assistance. Specifically, a state must increase its welfare caseloads in order to receive any funding, and states receive an 80% match to cover all expenses associated with increasing their welfare caseloads. This costs taxpayers $2.5 billion each year.




Just a couple of points here.



First, thanks to the GOP's obstruction, the TANF Emergency Fund expired on September 30, 2010, effectively putting the 240,000 people who found work through the program out of work. (This must be one of those "We had to destroy the village in order to save it," moments — when conservatives have to kill jobs in order to create them.) It was funded at $5 billion over two years. Now it's dead. The GOP killed it. There have been efforts to extend it, but at a maximum of $2.5 billion.



Second, where does this business about not "requiring able-bodied individuals to work" come from? The Emergency fund has, in its brief existence, put people to work who want to work and would have been out of work otherwise. The money from the Emergency Fund was used by states to subsidize jobs programs that have successfully put "able bodied individuals to work" — including some 120,000 young people who would not have had summer jobs, and 130,000 parents who wouldn't have had jobs to provide for their families.



Some of the successes of the Emergency Fund include:



  • South Carolina is using the program to provide jobs to parents who would otherwise be receiving cash assistance through the state's regular TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) program.


  • Illinois has placed more than 20,000 individuals in jobs, far exceeding its original goal of 12,000 placements.


  • Alabama is using the program to provide jobs to TANF recipients statewide, but has found it especially helpful in rural communities where very few job opportunities exist.


  • North Dakota is providing jobs for unemployed non-custodial parents who don't have the financial resources to meet their child support.


  • A rural community in Tennessee created 400 new jobs and helped reduce the county's unemployment rate from 27.3 to 18.6 percent over an eight-month period.



There's a whole lot more here, on how states used TANF to subsidize job programs and put people to work — people who would otherwise have just received cash assistance.



This, Republicans apparently believe, is a very bad thing. Maybe the GOP doesn't think these are "real" jobs. Maybe, like the aforementioned serial killer, the GOP just thinks some jobs need to die, because some jobs shouldn't exist in the first place. Likewise the people whose lives have gotten better because of those jobs.


The point is that the TANF Emergency Fund is an example of a safety net that works when the economy doesn't — like unemployment benefits keeping millions out of poverty — by putting hundreds of thousands of people back to work, where they can learn use their skills instead of lose them, and perhaps learn new skills that may lead to better jobs and better lives. If you want to talk about incentives, these are people who would otherwise have been collecting TANF cash benefits that aren't enough to meet basic needs.


Besides, if Republicans really want something to cut, there are far meatier parts of the budget just waiting for someone with a sharp knife.




One place Democrats could start fighting -- if they can find the backbone -- is to call out the new Republican Speaker Of The House John Boehner over his desire to trim the deficit with Draconian cuts in the federal budget. The word he used was "discretionary" funding. The largest discretionary line in the budget is the Pentagon.



This is a major pissing contest just waiting for somebody to begin the challenge. And the perfect place to start is for somebody to piss on Boehner's shoes

.

The Pentagon budget is the largest elephant in the room that no one except the antiwar left will talk about. There is no good reason for this, since the crisis represented by the bloated Pentagon budget goes far beyond the anti-war movement, reaching into the lives of all working Americans. Sure, it will mean a fight, but fighting is good at this juncture - much better than laying down.




No, it's far far better for them to be unemployed and wait for the private sector to create jobs, when taxes and wages are finally low enough. The GOP has no immediate plans to create jobs to replace those they're so eager to kill off. Their best idea is a old, one one: cut taxes and hope for the best. We know what that got us last time: a decade of zero job growth.


That the 240,000 people who will be out of work again are unlikely to find work in the private sector hardly matters. When the people who had work through the TANF Emergency Fund are finally out of work, the GOP will probably deny them unemployment benefits, too, just for kicks.


Until then, there's still some fun to be had with the still-fresh corpse of the TANF Emergency Fund.


-->




  • Why should my taxes subsidize your home purchase
    by izoneguy




  • Thune and Hatch
    by hoosierdoug




  • I won't forget Sean Bielat!
    by Philip




  • No matter what
    by caboose




  • That would be un-democratic
    by whats_up




  • Jeb? Really? We can do better.
    by acat




  • "Enemy of the State"?
    by myron_j_poltroonian




  • Wow, so lobbyists and special interests
    by Death_of_the_Donkey




  • the squeaky wheel gets the oil
    by chamberD




  • You still haven't given me
    by Death_of_the_Donkey




  • No, cheated is accurate. Obama's from Chicago.
    by acat




  • Speak for yourself
    by izoneguy




  • my heroes
    by elizabeth bennet




  • Eliminating the mortgage deduction would do more harm than good
    by izoneguy




  • Ann Marie is the voice of NY CD 25
    by plepaul




  • "Sans Culottes"?
    by myron_j_poltroonian




  • Only if we stay awake this time, Elizabeth.
    by acat




  • We Want to Win
    by Donald Ayotte




  • A link to the TX 27 Texas Sons of Liberty Riders - a comments page about the recount.
    by Philip




  • First
    by Death_of_the_Donkey




  • they still don't get it
    by elizabeth bennet




  • Not trying to
    by powertothepeople




  • Thank you for helping to keep these important races in the public eye.
    by Philip




  • WELLL...I did notice you did not mention the Hillary factor but
    by graciegirl




  • reaganauh2o- I think I have the answer to that
    by Scope




  • Awesome diary.
    by Tanggor




  • Would the mortgage interest deduction really melt down markets?
    by civil_truth




  • chamberD- It's not my attitude that needs adjusting
    by Scope




  • Sorry, than I must have misread something.
    by earlgrey




  • If They Didn't Propose 'Means-Test' Entitlements, They Weren't Serious (nt)
    by IJB




  • 5+5
    by fpete13527




  • No reason not to have more judicial elections
    by Christopher Renner




  • bigredone- This is exactly why
    by Scope




  • There's Another Campaign Law That Needs To Be Changed!
    by IJB




  • The elimination of dubious incentives like the mortgage interest deduction goes a long way to winning my favor on this report
    by izoneguy




  • I hope so too...
    by NeoKong




  • Don't let up...... Ever.
    by Kenny Solomon




  • No eminent domain for private gain
    by wattchildress




  • McCain-Feingold, SEC 601
    by BigGator5




  • Yes!
    by warkarma





eric seiger

Shawn Collins &amp; Missy Ward talk Affiliate Marketing at IMS 2009 by LevelTen_Colin


eric seiger

New Michael Jackson Track, &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39;, In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>

Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...

Olbermann Suspension Helped Fox <b>News</b> | FrumForum

MSNBC isn't an impartial arbiter of news, at least not the sanctified area in which Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and Rachel Maddow inhabit. It never was. And you may not see flowing robes and white collars but they preach to the choir all the ...

Michael Jackson&#39;s &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39; Saga Continues With Tweets <b>...</b>

"Regarding the song 'Breaking News' I am so sorry you have to deal with this. My uncle loved you so much and would not want it this way," Jackson's nephew Taryll tweeted. There are songs that are my uncle singing on the upcoming album ...


eric seiger

Shawn Collins &amp; Missy Ward talk Affiliate Marketing at IMS 2009 by LevelTen_Colin


eric seiger

New Michael Jackson Track, &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39;, In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>

Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...

Olbermann Suspension Helped Fox <b>News</b> | FrumForum

MSNBC isn't an impartial arbiter of news, at least not the sanctified area in which Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and Rachel Maddow inhabit. It never was. And you may not see flowing robes and white collars but they preach to the choir all the ...

Michael Jackson&#39;s &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39; Saga Continues With Tweets <b>...</b>

"Regarding the song 'Breaking News' I am so sorry you have to deal with this. My uncle loved you so much and would not want it this way," Jackson's nephew Taryll tweeted. There are songs that are my uncle singing on the upcoming album ...


eric seiger

New Michael Jackson Track, &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39;, In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>

Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...

Olbermann Suspension Helped Fox <b>News</b> | FrumForum

MSNBC isn't an impartial arbiter of news, at least not the sanctified area in which Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and Rachel Maddow inhabit. It never was. And you may not see flowing robes and white collars but they preach to the choir all the ...

Michael Jackson&#39;s &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39; Saga Continues With Tweets <b>...</b>

"Regarding the song 'Breaking News' I am so sorry you have to deal with this. My uncle loved you so much and would not want it this way," Jackson's nephew Taryll tweeted. There are songs that are my uncle singing on the upcoming album ...


eric seiger

New Michael Jackson Track, &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39;, In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>

Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...

Olbermann Suspension Helped Fox <b>News</b> | FrumForum

MSNBC isn't an impartial arbiter of news, at least not the sanctified area in which Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and Rachel Maddow inhabit. It never was. And you may not see flowing robes and white collars but they preach to the choir all the ...

Michael Jackson&#39;s &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39; Saga Continues With Tweets <b>...</b>

"Regarding the song 'Breaking News' I am so sorry you have to deal with this. My uncle loved you so much and would not want it this way," Jackson's nephew Taryll tweeted. There are songs that are my uncle singing on the upcoming album ...


eric seiger eric seiger
eric seiger

Shawn Collins &amp; Missy Ward talk Affiliate Marketing at IMS 2009 by LevelTen_Colin


eric seiger
eric seiger

New Michael Jackson Track, &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39;, In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>

Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...

Olbermann Suspension Helped Fox <b>News</b> | FrumForum

MSNBC isn't an impartial arbiter of news, at least not the sanctified area in which Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and Rachel Maddow inhabit. It never was. And you may not see flowing robes and white collars but they preach to the choir all the ...

Michael Jackson&#39;s &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39; Saga Continues With Tweets <b>...</b>

"Regarding the song 'Breaking News' I am so sorry you have to deal with this. My uncle loved you so much and would not want it this way," Jackson's nephew Taryll tweeted. There are songs that are my uncle singing on the upcoming album ...



Internet is a great invention after Fire and a Wheel. It has reached to every corner of the world. This is also known as World Wide Web i.e. www in short. It has affected every individual's life. After its invention it has reached present position in a very short span of time say, 10 to 15 years. Now, every learned person is involved with it. Internet became popular in a very short span because of its speed in exchanging information worldwide.

Peoples around the world are linked with the internet in many different ways; some want to get latest news, log in to their e-mail a/c to check mails, get a bit of knowledge required for the thesis, see films, download songs, download documents, sending files, sending messages and many, many more ways. We can say that the use of the Internet depends upon the person who uses it. Of all these purposes, the one which is very unique and same in terms of importance and that is, Earning Money Online!

Internet is the vast sea of knowledge. One can find many ways to get best information online. Provided that, he should be familiar with this scenario. This is because every good thing has some minus points too! Scammers also are present on the Internet. The main purpose of these scammers is to misguide the user and earn money he deposits online. The language used on the websites of this type is very influential and powerful it easily attracts our attention and makes us fall pray to the scam!! So beware while surfing the net for Money.

There are so many websites available for earning money on the Internet as Pay to Click, Pay to Read E-Mail, Pay to Write Contents, Pay to Sending E-mails, Pay to Submit Photographs, Pay to submit Artworks and even paid for attending surveys. As much one involves with these sites so much they engulf him. One requires his consciousness while surfing these websites. One is required to be alert to keep himself away from the promises offered on these sites to make a fraud.

Roughly, we can say that there are hundreds of Websites available on the Internet which offer activities for Making Money Online. The process of all Websites is same. Every Websites asks its user to register for its program. Registration process means making your gateway into the program. It means creating your Log-In ID and a Password. These two terms are very valuable for you hence, you should not disclose it to anyone. Programs are mentioned above. After Registering you can start doing activities directly or in some cases, you have to confirm your registration from your e-mail account by clicking on the the link provided into your e-mail account. It is advised here that you should have a registered E-mail id with either Pay-Pal, AlertPay or Moneybookers as the case may be. This will add smoothness to withdraw amount when you reach the minimum payout limit. When you request your money withdrawal your request may be processed between from 01 day to 60 days and you may have to pay some amount to your processing company as commission.

From the whole information above, you may have got a rough idea about earning money on the Internet. By using your consciousness and applying your knowledge you will be able to find out the one which is most suitable for you; so go ahead and start now! We wish you every success and happy earning!!In today's world Internet is available in every field. Each individual with good exposure to the net can surf all around. The purposes are different. Peoples surf the the for Information, Entertainment, News, Study & Earning Money.



eric seiger

New Michael Jackson Track, &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39;, In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>

Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...

Olbermann Suspension Helped Fox <b>News</b> | FrumForum

MSNBC isn't an impartial arbiter of news, at least not the sanctified area in which Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and Rachel Maddow inhabit. It never was. And you may not see flowing robes and white collars but they preach to the choir all the ...

Michael Jackson&#39;s &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39; Saga Continues With Tweets <b>...</b>

"Regarding the song 'Breaking News' I am so sorry you have to deal with this. My uncle loved you so much and would not want it this way," Jackson's nephew Taryll tweeted. There are songs that are my uncle singing on the upcoming album ...


eric seiger

New Michael Jackson Track, &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39;, In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>

Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...

Olbermann Suspension Helped Fox <b>News</b> | FrumForum

MSNBC isn't an impartial arbiter of news, at least not the sanctified area in which Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and Rachel Maddow inhabit. It never was. And you may not see flowing robes and white collars but they preach to the choir all the ...

Michael Jackson&#39;s &#39;Breaking <b>News</b>&#39; Saga Continues With Tweets <b>...</b>

"Regarding the song 'Breaking News' I am so sorry you have to deal with this. My uncle loved you so much and would not want it this way," Jackson's nephew Taryll tweeted. There are songs that are my uncle singing on the upcoming album ...


eric seiger

No comments:

Post a Comment